Back to articles

Gradual Abolition of the Marital Quotient – What Impact on Your Tax Position?

March 6, 2026

The draft bill on the reform of personal income tax, submitted to Parliament on 14 January 2026, provides for the gradual abolition of the marital quotient mechanism. Once adopted, this measure will significantly affect the tax position of many single-income couples or couples with highly unbalanced incomes.

Gradual Abolition of the Marital Quotient – What Impact on Your Tax Position?

Proposed measures

The marital quotient, which applies to married couples and legally cohabiting partners, currently allows up to 30% of the professional income of the higher-earning partner to be notionaly attributed to the other partner where the latter earns little or no professional income.

This attribution is, however, subject to a cap (€13,460 for assessment year 2026).

The draft bill provides for a gradual abolition, with differentiated rules depending on the taxpayers concerned:

  • For couples where both partners have reached the statutory retirement age, the mechanism would be maintained on a transitional basis, but phased out gradually over a period of approximately twenty years. The 30% rate would be retained during this period, while the maximum amount would be progressively reduced, leading to a complete abolition as from assessment year 2046.
     
  • For all other taxpayers, the maximum amount of the marital quotient would be reduced by half over four assessment years (from assessment year 2027 to assessment year 2030).
     
  • As from assessment year 2027, the maximum applicable amounts would no longer be indexed.


Rationale put forward by the legislator

The reform is driven by the intention to strengthen tax neutrality between different forms of cohabitation, as the marital quotient is not available to de facto cohabitants. It also reflects a broader shift towards a tax system that is less centred on the single-income household model. Finally, the legislator considers that the mechanism may act as a disincentive to labour market participation by the second partner.

In practice, this reform may result in a gradual increase in the tax burden for certain households, making it advisable to anticipate its impact in light of the household’s income structure.

As the bill has not yet been definitively adopted, amendments remain possible. We will, of course, keep you informed of further developments.


At Andersen in Belgium, we remain at your disposal to assess the concrete impact of these measures on your personal tax situation.
If you have any questions about this topic or require assistance in the context of a dispute with the tax authorities, please do not hesitate to contact the tax department at Andersen.
Sébastien Watelet (Tax Partner) & Océane Magotteaux (Associate)

Discover more about this topic?

I am looking for a specialist in

See more articles

New rules tighten requirements for sustainability claims in the real estate sector

05.11.2026

•

Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium

New rules tighten requirements for sustainability claims in the real estate sector

Sustainable, green, energy-efficient or even climate-neutral: these terms have become commonplace in real estate communications. From the end of September, however, the use of such claims will be subject to stricter rules. The new rules aim to better protect consumers against misleading environmental claims. For businesses, the message is clear: commercial communications will need to be more precise.

Read the article »
Belgium imposes new workplace regulations

05.11.2026

•

Employment Law, Andersen in Belgium

Belgium imposes new workplace regulations

Employers must make sure that their internal policies are up date according to Belgium’s PIA and prepare for a stricter time registration obligation.

Read the article »
No Exact Correlation Required Between Expenses Relating to a Holiday Residence and Benefits in Kind

03.11.2026

•

Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium

No Exact Correlation Required Between Expenses Relating to a Holiday Residence and Benefits in Kind

In its judgment of 18 June 2026, the Belgian Court of Cassation settled an important question concerning the deductibility of expenses incurred in making a holiday residence available to a company director: must these expenses be capped at the amount of the benefit in kind (BIK) taxed in the hands of the director? The Court answered in the negative.

Read the article »
Copyright and Tax Abuse: The Court of Cassation Gets Its Wires Crossed!

03.11.2026

•

Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium

Copyright and Tax Abuse: The Court of Cassation Gets Its Wires Crossed!

In a rather surprising judgment of 14 September 2026 (F.23.0097.F), the Belgian Court of Cassation failed to correctly identify the legislature's objectives when introducing the flat-rate tax regime for copyright and related rights income. The courts should swiftly distance themselves from this judgment!

Read the article »