The draft bill reforming personal income tax, submitted to the Chamber of Representatives on 17 December 2025, introduces a significant amendment regarding the minimum remuneration of company directors and, consequently, the conditions for applying the reduced corporate income tax rate.

As from assessment year 2026 (i.e. for financial years closing on 31 December 2025 or later), the minimum annual gross remuneration required for company directors will increase from EUR 45,000 to EUR 50,000.
The standard Belgian corporate income tax rate is 25% and applies to the company’s entire taxable profit.
However, small companies may benefit from a preferential regime under which a reduced rate of 20% applies to the first EUR 100,000 of taxable profit. Any taxable profit exceeding this threshold remains subject to the standard 25% rate.
In order to qualify for the reduced corporate income tax (CIT) rate of 20% on the first EUR 100,000 of taxable profit, the company must grant at least one company director a minimum annual remuneration. This threshold, previously set at EUR 45,000, will be increased to EUR 50,000 per year.
A key development is that the EUR 50,000 threshold will henceforth be subject to annual indexation, thereby safeguarding the real value of this condition over time.
The draft bill further clarifies that benefits in kind (e.g. company car, housing, etc.) may no longer exceed 20% of the director’s total remuneration package. In practical terms, out of the required EUR 50,000, no more than EUR 10,000 may consist of benefits in kind.
The balance must consist of effective gross remuneration.
It should be noted that reimbursements of expenses proper to the employer, copyright income and individual pension commitments are excluded from this calculation.
The draft bill maintains the existing exception whereby the remuneration condition is deemed fulfilled if the director’s remuneration is at least equal to the company’s taxable profit, even where such remuneration is below EUR 50,000.
For example, a company generating a taxable profit of EUR 35,000 may still benefit from the reduced rate provided it grants remuneration of EUR 35,000 to its director.
* * *
In light of these amendments, it is advisable to take this new framework into account when reviewing your remuneration strategy.
The maximum tax benefit derived from the reduced rate – i.e. EUR 5,000 per year on the first EUR 100,000 of taxable profit – must be weighed against the additional tax and social security cost of increasing remuneration by EUR 5,000 or adjusting the level of benefits in kind.
A tailored financial analysis of your situation will allow for the identification of the solution best aligned with your wealth planning objectives and the economic reality of your business. Our firm remains at your disposal to assist you in this assessment and to design an optimal strategy.
Grâce Longanga (Counsel) & Sébastien Watelet (Tax Partner)
I am looking for a specialist in

05.11.2026
•Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium
Sustainable, green, energy-efficient or even climate-neutral: these terms have become commonplace in real estate communications. From the end of September, however, the use of such claims will be subject to stricter rules. The new rules aim to better protect consumers against misleading environmental claims. For businesses, the message is clear: commercial communications will need to be more precise.

05.11.2026
•Employment Law, Andersen in Belgium
Employers must make sure that their internal policies are up date according to Belgium’s PIA and prepare for a stricter time registration obligation.

03.11.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
In its judgment of 18 June 2026, the Belgian Court of Cassation settled an important question concerning the deductibility of expenses incurred in making a holiday residence available to a company director: must these expenses be capped at the amount of the benefit in kind (BIK) taxed in the hands of the director? The Court answered in the negative.

03.11.2026
•Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium
In a rather surprising judgment of 14 September 2026 (F.23.0097.F), the Belgian Court of Cassation failed to correctly identify the legislature's objectives when introducing the flat-rate tax regime for copyright and related rights income. The courts should swiftly distance themselves from this judgment!