Back to articles

Donor children – update following the federal coalition agreement for 2025-2029

By
February 3, 2025

The new federal coalition agreement for 2025-2029 acknowledges that the legal provisions regarding professional secrecy and the anonymity of sperm donors should no longer result in a donor child being unable to obtain any identifying or non-identifying information from the fertility center and states that "knowing one's own origins can be important for the identity formation of donor children."

Donor children – update following the federal coalition agreement for 2025-2029

In our article of 6 November 2024, we discussed the ruling of the Constitutional Court of 26 September 2024, and its consequences. 

This ruling states that the current legal provisions regarding professional secrecy and the anonymity of sperm donors should no longer result in a donor child being unable to obtain any identifying or non-identifying information from the fertility center.

The new federal coalition agreement for 2025-2029 acknowledges this and states that “knowing one’s own origins can be important for the identity formation of donor children.”

Therefore, according to the coalition agreement, the anonymity of sperm and egg donors will be abolished for the future. For donations made in the past, a transitional measure will be sought, in line with the aforementioned ruling of the Constitutional Court, to establish a fair balance between donor children, intended parents, and donors.

If the anonymity of sperm and egg donors from the past is not abolished, we believe this does not prevent existing donor children from going to court. For this, we refer to our article of 6 December 2024.

What the transitional measure will specifically entail is not yet known. The legislator has until 30 June 2027, to address this matter.

We will continue to monitor further developments. If you have any questions regarding this topic, please do not hesitate to contact our specialists at info@be.Andersen.com or +32 (0)2 747 40 07.

Discover more about this topic?

I am looking for a specialist in

See more articles

New rules tighten requirements for sustainability claims in the real estate sector

05.11.2026

•

Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium

New rules tighten requirements for sustainability claims in the real estate sector

Sustainable, green, energy-efficient or even climate-neutral: these terms have become commonplace in real estate communications. From the end of September, however, the use of such claims will be subject to stricter rules. The new rules aim to better protect consumers against misleading environmental claims. For businesses, the message is clear: commercial communications will need to be more precise.

Read the article »
Belgium imposes new workplace regulations

05.11.2026

•

Employment Law, Andersen in Belgium

Belgium imposes new workplace regulations

Employers must make sure that their internal policies are up date according to Belgium’s PIA and prepare for a stricter time registration obligation.

Read the article »
No Exact Correlation Required Between Expenses Relating to a Holiday Residence and Benefits in Kind

03.11.2026

•

Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium

No Exact Correlation Required Between Expenses Relating to a Holiday Residence and Benefits in Kind

In its judgment of 18 June 2026, the Belgian Court of Cassation settled an important question concerning the deductibility of expenses incurred in making a holiday residence available to a company director: must these expenses be capped at the amount of the benefit in kind (BIK) taxed in the hands of the director? The Court answered in the negative.

Read the article »
Copyright and Tax Abuse: The Court of Cassation Gets Its Wires Crossed!

03.11.2026

•

Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium

Copyright and Tax Abuse: The Court of Cassation Gets Its Wires Crossed!

In a rather surprising judgment of 14 September 2026 (F.23.0097.F), the Belgian Court of Cassation failed to correctly identify the legislature's objectives when introducing the flat-rate tax regime for copyright and related rights income. The courts should swiftly distance themselves from this judgment!

Read the article »