Back to articles

PEPPOL COUNTDOWN: Are you ready for e-invoicing in 2026?

December 17, 2025

As of 1 January 2026, all companies established in Belgium and registered for VAT, except those that are fully exempt, have to issue their B2B invoices via the Peppol network. For the sake of completeness, Peppol enables businesses and public authorities to exchange invoices securely and in a standardized manner via accredited access points. As from that date, PDF invoices and paper invoices will no longer be legally valid.

PEPPOL COUNTDOWN: Are you ready for e-invoicing in 2026?

Despite extensive information campaigns, it appears that less than half of Belgian businesses are currently compliant with the new statutory obligation. Failure to switch in time, may, as from 1 January 2026, result inter alia in:

  • Invalid invoices, meaning that the customer is under no obligation to pay;
  • Loss of VAT deductibility;
  • Disputes and operational disruptions;
  • Administrative fines of up to EUR 5,000 per incorrect invoice;
  • Contractual liability and reputational damage.

The Federal Public Service Finance (FPS Finance) has, however, recently announced the introduction of a tolerance period of three months (until the end of March 2026). During this period, no fines will be imposed for invoices that aren’t sent via Peppol, provided that the involved company can demonstrate that it has taken the necessary steps in due time (e.g. entering into a contract with a software provider, internal project planning, etc.) to comply with this new legal obligation.

Hereby you will find a practical guide: who, what and how before 1 January 2026?

1. Who must use Peppol?

  • Belgian taxable persons established in Belgium (i.e. VAT-liable entities established in Belgium) in a Belgian B2B context, including non-profit organizations. VAT-registered entities that are not established in Belgium do not fall within the scope of this obligation, even though they may still have VAT obligations in Belgium (e.g. VAT returns, invoicing obligations, etc.).
  • B2B within the EU? Mandatory e-invoicing for intra-Community B2B invoices will only apply as from July, 1 2030.
  • B2C? No obligation, but if applied voluntarily, be aware of GDPR compliance (secure digital transmission) and consumer protection rules (such as transparent communication, an accessible alternative for non-digital customers, etc.).

2. What will change?

  • Only invoices sent via Peppol will be considered legally issued.
  • Errors in an invoice can, after transmission via Peppol, only be corrected by means of a credit note, which must also be sent via Peppol.
  • Peppol provides evidence and traceability: the system automatically records the date and time of dispatch and receipt. Disputes such as “I never received the invoice” will effectively disappear.

Peppol, however, does not affect the following:

  • Payment terms remain governed by statutory and contractual provisions. Peppol does not regulate the payment of invoices.
  • Acceptance of the invoice remains subject to existing rules. Upon receipt via Peppol, the customer remains obliged to verify the invoice and, where appropriate, lodge a protest. Any protest must be timely and duly reasoned.
  • Reminders and formal notices are not sent via Peppol but continue to be issued by email or registered letter.

3. Update your general terms and conditions

  • Designate Peppol as the sole legally valid method of transmission. Provide that any other form of invoice can only be regarded as a copy.
  • Include your Peppol ID (your unique electronic address) to avoid disputes regarding an incorrect or invalid delivery point.
  • Amend payment clauses, verification and dispute provisions to reflect the use of Peppol. For example: the customer must notify any errors within X days of receipt via Peppol (the processing of invoices via Peppol may qualify more quickly as implicit acceptance).

Not all Peppol software solutions allow the automatic inclusion of general terms and conditions. It is still recommended to provide the general terms and conditions separately, e.g. together with quotations, purchase orders, order confirmations, delivery notes, etc.

4. Questions about implementation, legal impact or your general terms and conditions?

Andersen in Belgium will be pleased to assist you with the practical and legal implementation of Peppol within your organization, as well as with the revision of your contracts and general terms and conditions on this point.

David Van Iseghem (Partner – Mediator) & Roxane Vrambout (Associate)

Discover more about this topic?

I am looking for a specialist in

See more articles

New rules tighten requirements for sustainability claims in the real estate sector

05.11.2026

•

Real Estate, Renting and Co-ownership, Andersen in Belgium

New rules tighten requirements for sustainability claims in the real estate sector

Sustainable, green, energy-efficient or even climate-neutral: these terms have become commonplace in real estate communications. From the end of September, however, the use of such claims will be subject to stricter rules. The new rules aim to better protect consumers against misleading environmental claims. For businesses, the message is clear: commercial communications will need to be more precise.

Read the article »
Belgium imposes new workplace regulations

05.11.2026

•

Employment Law, Andersen in Belgium

Belgium imposes new workplace regulations

Employers must make sure that their internal policies are up date according to Belgium’s PIA and prepare for a stricter time registration obligation.

Read the article »
No Exact Correlation Required Between Expenses Relating to a Holiday Residence and Benefits in Kind

03.11.2026

•

Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium

No Exact Correlation Required Between Expenses Relating to a Holiday Residence and Benefits in Kind

In its judgment of 18 June 2026, the Belgian Court of Cassation settled an important question concerning the deductibility of expenses incurred in making a holiday residence available to a company director: must these expenses be capped at the amount of the benefit in kind (BIK) taxed in the hands of the director? The Court answered in the negative.

Read the article »
Copyright and Tax Abuse: The Court of Cassation Gets Its Wires Crossed!

03.11.2026

•

Tax Law, Andersen in Belgium

Copyright and Tax Abuse: The Court of Cassation Gets Its Wires Crossed!

In a rather surprising judgment of 14 September 2026 (F.23.0097.F), the Belgian Court of Cassation failed to correctly identify the legislature's objectives when introducing the flat-rate tax regime for copyright and related rights income. The courts should swiftly distance themselves from this judgment!

Read the article »